🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," said one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that states globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.